Prior Projects
Find a Project
Explore CALeVIP’s past projects that helped accelerate the installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure across California.
CALeVIP 2.0:
Fast Charge California Project
Application Window:
8/5/2025 – 1/29/2026
Statewide, DC Fast Chargers (DCFC)
Project Overview:
DCFC rebates up to 100% of a project's total approved costs, capped at up to $100,000 per charging port
Disadvantaged communities (DACs) and low-income communities (LICs) were NOT REQUIRED, but DAC/LIC and tribal applications that meet ready-to-build requirements were prioritized.
Funding was awarded on a first-come, first-served basis to ready-to-build projects (issued permit and final utility service design).
Incentives available for project sites across California
CALeVIP 2.0:
Golden State Priority Project (Northern & Southern Regions)
Application Window:
9/13/2023 – 12/12/2023
Northern & Southern Regions, DC Fast Chargers (DCFC)
Project Overview:
DCFC rebates up to 50% of a project's total approved costs, capped at up to $100,000 per charging port.
Exclusively for disadvantaged community (DAC) or low-income community (LIC) census tracts.
Tiered application selection process prioritizes shovel-ready projects.
Windows released by defined regions.
CALeVIP 2.0:
Golden State Priority Project (Eastern & Central Regions)
Application Window:
1/20/2023 – 3/10/2023
Eastern & Central Regions, DC Fast Chargers (DCFC)
Project Overview:
DCFC rebates up to 50% of a project's total approved costs, capped at up to $100,000 per charging port.
Exclusively for disadvantaged community (DAC) or low-income community (LIC) census tracts.
Tiered application selection process prioritizes shovel-ready projects.
Windows released by defined regions.
Project Overview:
Incentivized the installation of both Level 2 and DC fast chargers through 13 regional projects that funded chargers across 36 counties.
Directed up to 60% of project funding for installations in low-income and disadvantaged communities.
Rebates covered up to 75% of installation costs.
Some projects included supplementary funding from partners including local utilities, air districts, and other organizations.